This test measures the total time it takes to load a standard web page. Lower is better.
If you're really interested, I use the 'Load Time' measurement that's returned from WebPageTest for ranking page speed. I still collect other metrics such as TTFB (time to first byte), fully loaded time, and the speed index, in addition to server setting scores which are translated to grades. You can see these detailed values in the "Raw Results."
This test is important if your site resembles a typical website and you're concerned about speed (which you should be!)
|HostGator||2.82 s||2.07 s||15.02 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
|GoDaddy||2.94 s||0.31 s||37.97 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
|StableHost||2.96 s||0.12 s||12.29 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
|Bluehost||3.05 s||0.30 s||9.17 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
|MDDHosting||3.09 s||2.06 s||74.96 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
|DreamHost||3.12 s||0.01 s||21.25 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
|Namecheap||3.15 s||2.09 s||72.71 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
|InMotion Hosting||3.19 s||2.13 s||14.12 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
|Site5||3.30 s||0.25 s||46.28 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
|Yahoo Small Business||4.04 s||2.53 s||60.95 s||Test Results||Signup Now|
HostGator performs impressively in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 2.82 seconds. Its best run was 2.07 s, but has been as bad as 15.02 s. HostGator's most recent result on Mar 23 was 2.40 seconds. Back in the day HostGator used to share a datacenter with SoftLayer - and they were lightning fast. Now that they made everyone transition to their own datacenter (after the EIG buyout), page speed has been worse, although not as bad as some other hosts here.
GoDaddy performs impressively in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 2.94 seconds. Its best run was 0.31 s, but has been as bad as 37.97 s. GoDaddy's most recent result on Mar 23 was 2.31 seconds. GoDaddy consistently has very fast page load speeds. I'm attributing this to the fact that they have a stellar Hosting Optimization team, headed by Dave Koopman. He actually reached out to me after seeing this site to not only give me kudos for doing this, but offer additional testing resources (which at the moment I am not using). Regardless, he's pretty passionate about their hosting performance and their stats prove it.
StableHost performs great in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 2.96 seconds. Its best run was 0.12 s, but has been as bad as 12.29 s. StableHost's most recent result on Mar 23 was 0.54 seconds. Stablehost is one of the few hosts that routinely has page load times under 3 seconds - that's awesome. They have all headers optimized for performance (compression, caching, connections), and their stats back it up.
Bluehost performs above average in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.05 seconds. Its best run was 0.30 s, but has been as bad as 9.17 s. Bluehost's most recent result on Mar 23 was 2.38 seconds. Bluehost is usually pretty inconsistent with its page speeds - sometimes quicker than other hosts, sometimes slower. Its slowest times are usually when accessed from the east coast. While they do optimize connections and compress images, they fail to set caching properly for repeat views.
MDDHosting performs stellar in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.09 seconds. Its best run was 2.06 s, but has been as bad as 74.96 s. MDDHosting's most recent result on Mar 23 was 2.38 seconds. I had heard great things about MDDHosting, and I thought their speed would be on par, but it has proven to have some hiccups. Lately they've been alright, but back in October I was seeing load times of 10+ seconds - wow that's poor! Yet, they are one of the few hosts that has all their server settings optimized.
DreamHost performs above average in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.12 seconds. Its best run was 0.01 s, but has been as bad as 21.25 s. DreamHost's most recent result on Mar 23 was 0.24 seconds. I expected Dreamhost to have poor performance, but they're not that bad. There are faster hosts out there, but you're not going to be disappointed with them.
Namecheap performs great in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.15 seconds. Its best run was 2.09 s, but has been as bad as 72.71 s. Namecheap's most recent result on Mar 23 was 2.40 seconds. Namecheap proves that they have consistent, low page load times. While I bet it could be improved if they enabled compression and caching headers, their stats are something other hosts strive for.
InMotion Hosting performs above average in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.19 seconds. Its best run was 2.13 s, but has been as bad as 14.12 s. InMotion Hosting's most recent result on Mar 23 was 2.76 seconds. InMotion proves to be stable in its page speed results, usually showing no spikes or erratic performance. While they do optimize connections, they could be making things faster by compressing images and setting the cache headers properly.
|Host||Location||Load time||TTFB||Fully loaded||Speed index||Keep-alive Score||Compress Score||Caching Score|