StableHost Review and Stats
StableHost's claim to fame is their stability. They've been around since 2009 and host around 32,000 domains. They have data centers located in Phoenix, Arizona; Chicago, Illinois; and Amsterdam, Netherlands.
I have purchased a hosting plan on StableHost and set up a typical web site. I use that example website to run these tests. Learn more about how I test.
Here's the plan information I chose:
| Plan Name | Stable |
| Cost | $5.95/month |
| Disk Space | 7GB |
| Bandwidth | Unlimited |
| Uptime Guarantee | 99.9% |
| Money-Back Guarantee | 45 days |
| Notes | Site was ready within minutes after I purchased. |
On this page: Uptime | Speed | Support | Alternatives
Uptime Test
This test is performed by measuring the % uptime of a host. Higher is better.
I use Pingdom to report website uptime. Pingdom is configured to make an HTTP request to the host every minute, and report if it is unreachable. It'll also report an error if the host takes longer than 30 seconds to respond (Yes, that's not actually down, but if your site takes that long to respond it is unusable in my opinion). Pingdom performs this test from at least 3 servers worldwide, and reports a problem if 2/3 servers do no respond.
This test is important if you are concerned about the reliability of your web host (this is important!)
StableHost Uptime Test Results
StableHost performs alright in the Uptime test, with an average result of 99.94 percent. Its best run was 100.00 %, but has been as bad as 91.88 %. StableHost's most recent result on Aug 21 was 100.00 percent. Stablehost really lives up to its name - proving itself with one of the best uptime percentages around, it truly is stable. Not sure I've witnessed an outage more than a minute or two with them. That's unheard of. Kudos, Stablehost.
Let's see if StableHost is consistent in its uptime stats:
Recent Raw Results for StableHost
| Date | Uptime | Downtime | Outages | Avg Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 412 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 404 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 485 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 450 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 462 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 481 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 491 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 468 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 464 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 482 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 470 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 462 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 493 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 486 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 448 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 443 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 449 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 446 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 426 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 418 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 411 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 402 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 392 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 381 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 389 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 401 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 449 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 562 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 565 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 556 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 562 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 526 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 532 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 500 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 562 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 563 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 850 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 792 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 788 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 639 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 513 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 536 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 527 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 523 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 512 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 502 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 498 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 491 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 470 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 428 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 439 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 435 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 452 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 432 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 463 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 439 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 418 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 430 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 452 ms | |
| 100.000 % | 0 mins | 0 | 472 ms |
Page Speed Test
This test measures the total time it takes to load a standard web page. Lower is better.
This test is performed by submitting a typical web page served on the host to WebPageTest and recording how long it takes to load. This test web page is 56 KB of HTML, 287 KB of JavaScript, 51 KB of CSS, and 1,128 KB of images (these are typical according to the HTTP Archive). WebPageTest (a 3rd-party, vendor-neutral organization) uses servers located in Virgina and California to measure the page load waterfall in the latest version of Chrome, on a very fast internet connection. The test is ran 5 times each, and the middle (median) result is what is counted from each location. Then the east coast and west coast times are averaged, which should eliminate any bias due to server location. We're interested in first page load, not the repeat/cached view.
If you're really interested, I use the 'Load Time' measurement that's returned from WebPageTest for ranking page speed. I still collect other metrics such as TTFB
(time to first byte), fully loaded time, and the speed index, in addition to server setting scores which are translated to grades. You can see these detailed values in the "Raw Results."
This test is important if your site resembles a typical website and you're concerned about speed (which you should be!)
In September 2014 I updated this test to be more accurate, and you'll notice page speeds were a bit higher before then. The test used to be run only 3 times from one location using a simulated cable internet connection on Internet Explorer 11. The new method provides much more consistent results.
StableHost Page Speed Test Results
StableHost performs great in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.07 seconds. Its best run was 2.39 s, but has been as bad as 12.29 s. StableHost's most recent result on Aug 21 was 2.87 seconds. Stablehost is one of the few hosts that routinely has page load times under 3 seconds - that's awesome. They have all headers optimized for performance (compression, caching, connections), and their stats back it up.
Let's see if StableHost is consistent in its page speed stats:
Recent Raw Results for StableHost
| Date | Location | Load time | TTFB | Fully loaded | Speed index | Keep-alive Score | Compress Score | Caching Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5s | 0.4s | 3.6s | 1.9s | A | A | A | ||
| 2.2s | 0.2s | 2.3s | 1.4s | A | A | A | ||
| 3.0s | 0.8s | 3.2s | 1.7s | A | A | A | ||
| 2.2s | 0.2s | 2.3s | 1.4s | A | A | A | ||
| 3.0s | 0.4s | 3.1s | 1.5s | A | A | A | ||
| 2.2s | 0.2s | 2.3s | 1.3s | A | A | A | ||
| 3.0s | 0.4s | 3.1s | 1.8s | A | A | A | ||
| 2.4s | 0.2s | 2.4s | 1.5s | A | A | A | ||
| 3.7s | 0.3s | 3.8s | 2.3s | A | A | A | ||
| 2.2s | 0.2s | 2.3s | 1.4s | A | A | A | ||
| 2.8s | 0.4s | 2.9s | 1.6s | A | A | A | ||
| 2.2s | 0.2s | 2.3s | 1.2s | A | A | A | ||
| 3.0s | 0.4s | 3.1s | 1.5s | A | A | A | ||
| 2.4s | 0.2s | 2.4s | 1.3s | A | A | A | ||
| 3.1s | 0.5s | 3.2s | 1.9s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.6s | 0.4s | 3.7s | 2.2s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.7s | 1.7s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.7s | 0.4s | 3.9s | 2.2s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.7s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.3s | 0.4s | 3.4s | 1.9s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.3s | 0.7s | 3.4s | 2.0s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.7s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.1s | 0.3s | 3.3s | 1.8s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.7s | 0.4s | 3.8s | 1.9s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.1s | 0.4s | 3.2s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.8s | 0.4s | 2.9s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.4s | 0.4s | 3.5s | 2.1s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.7s | 1.4s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.5s | 0.7s | 3.6s | 2.2s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.8s | 0.2s | 2.9s | 1.5s | A | F | F | ||
| 4.4s | 0.5s | 4.5s | 2.5s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.8s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.7s | 0.8s | 3.8s | 2.1s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.7s | 1.5s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.1s | 0.3s | 3.3s | 1.7s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.7s | 0.3s | 3.8s | 1.9s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.5s | 0.4s | 3.6s | 2.1s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 4.3s | 1.0s | 4.5s | 2.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.7s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.8s | 1.1s | 3.9s | 2.3s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 2.0s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.2s | 0.3s | 3.3s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.6s | 0.3s | 3.7s | 1.5s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.7s | 1.7s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.7s | 1.1s | 3.9s | 2.4s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.7s | 1.6s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.2s | 0.4s | 3.3s | 1.9s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.5s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.4s | 0.3s | 3.5s | 1.7s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.7s | 1.5s | A | F | F | ||
| 3.7s | 0.5s | 3.9s | 2.1s | A | F | F | ||
| 2.7s | 0.2s | 2.8s | 1.6s | A | F | F |
Does StableHost Suck?
Some people may think StableHost sucks. Here are some real benchmarks to show you StableHost's speed, reliability, and support - so you can see if they really do suck.
Is StableHost slow?
This test measures the total time it takes to load a standard web page. Lower is better. Learn more about the Page Speed Test.
StableHost performs above average in the Page Speed test, with an average result of 3.07 seconds. Its best run was 2.39 s, but has been as bad as 12.29 s. StableHost's most recent result on Aug 21 was 2.87 seconds. Stablehost is one of the few hosts that routinely has page load times under 3 seconds - that's awesome. They have all headers optimized for performance (compression, caching, connections), and their stats back it up.
Let's take a look at some of the times that StableHost had some poor page speed performance:
| Date | Location | Load time | TTFB | Fully loaded | Speed index | Keep-alive Score | Compress Score | Caching Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.4s | 0.5s | 4.5s | 2.5s | A | F | F | ||
| 4.3s | 1.0s | 4.5s | 2.6s | A | F | F |
Is StableHost unreliable?
This test is performed by measuring the % uptime of a host. Higher is better. Learn more about the Uptime Test.
StableHost performs mediocre in the Uptime test, with an average result of 99.94 percent. Its best run was 100.00 %, but has been as bad as 91.88 %. StableHost's most recent result on Aug 21 was 100.00 percent. Stablehost really lives up to its name - proving itself with one of the best uptime percentages around, it truly is stable. Not sure I've witnessed an outage more than a minute or two with them. That's unheard of. Kudos, Stablehost.
Let's take a look at some of the times that StableHost had some poor uptime performance:
| Date | Uptime | Downtime | Outages | Avg Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| None found! | ||||
Does StableHost's have poor customer service?
This test measures how quickly the host's support team responds to your request. Lower is better. Learn more about the Support Response Test.
StableHost performs incredibly in the Support Response test, with an average result of 0.4 hours. Its best run was 0.1 h, but has been as bad as 1.7 h. StableHost's most recent result on Mar 2016 was 0.2 hours. Stablehost's tech team is top notch not just in their speed and uptime knowledge, but in their response time too. You can count on the fact that Stablehost will get back to you within a couple hours - and most likely a few minutes.
Let's take a look at some of the times that StableHost had some poor support response performance:
| Date | Support Ticket Submitted | Support Ticket Resolved | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| None found! | |||
Still think StableHost sucks?
I've presented you with lots of data that will show you whether or not StableHost sucks. So, what do you think? Are they reliable, fast, and helpful? If not, consider these StableHost alternatives.
Support Response Test
This test measures how quickly the host's support team responds to your request. Lower is better.
I personally contact each host's support department with a new question/concern and measure how long it takes for them to get back to me.
This test is important for every host - it's imperative your web host is able to quickly address your concerns in a timely manner, even if you're an expert webmaster. Who wants to deal with a host that has poor customer service? Tech is hard, and tech support is critical!
StableHost Support Response Test Results
StableHost performs stellar in the Support Response test, with an average result of 0.4 hours. Its best run was 0.1 h, but has been as bad as 1.7 h. StableHost's most recent result on Mar 2016 was 0.2 hours. Stablehost's tech team is top notch not just in their speed and uptime knowledge, but in their response time too. You can count on the fact that Stablehost will get back to you within a couple hours - and most likely a few minutes.
Let's see if StableHost is consistent in its support response stats:
Recent Raw Results for StableHost
| Date | Support Ticket Submitted | Support Ticket Resolved | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2:47pm | Mar 10, 2:56pm | 0.2 hours | |
| Feb 24, 3:35am | Feb 24, 4:05am | 0.5 hours | |
| Jan 27, 5:59am | Jan 27, 6:09am | 0.2 hours | |
| Dec 20, 2:56pm | Dec 20, 3:04pm | 0.1 hours | |
| Nov 28, 4:40pm | Nov 28, 4:44pm | 0.1 hours | |
| Oct 26, 10:58am | Oct 26, 11:12am | 0.2 hours | |
| Sept 6, 6:51pm | Sept 6, 8:32pm | 1.7 hours | |
| Aug 9, 3:02pm | Aug 9, 3:08pm | 0.1 hours | |
| July 13, 2:17pm | July 13, 2:30pm | 0.2 hours |
StableHost Alternatives: Better speed, reliability, and support
Are you having problems with StableHost? It's not uncommon to want to change to a better host if your current host has issues with being slow, down, or unsupportive.
Let's see if we can find a StableHost competitor that has better uptime, faster load times, and speedier support.
Hosts faster than StableHost
This test measures the total time it takes to load a standard web page. Lower is better. Learn more about the Page Speed Test.
If StableHost is having page speed problems, consider these alternative hosts that score better:
| Host | Average | Best | Worst | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HostGator | 2.88 s | 2.38 s | 15.02 s | Test Results | Signup Now |
| GoDaddy | 3.04 s | 0.31 s | 37.97 s | Test Results | Signup Now |
| StableHost | 3.07 s | 2.39 s | 12.29 s | Test Results | Signup Now |
Hosts more reliable than StableHost
This test is performed by measuring the % uptime of a host. Higher is better. Learn more about the Uptime Test.
If StableHost is having uptime problems, consider these alternative hosts that score better:
Hosts more helpful than StableHost
This test measures how quickly the host's support team responds to your request. Lower is better. Learn more about the Support Response Test.
If StableHost is having support response problems, consider these alternative hosts that score better:
StableHost Versus Other Hosts
If you're trying to decide between StableHost and another host, here's are some specific comparisons that will show you the differences in detail:
Yes, I do use affiliate links on this site to help cover the cost of testing and $1000+ per year in server charges. Results are 100% unbiased and never skewed to favor a higher commission. Thanks for understanding :)
© 2014-2017 Down.com